Overall the Cover of vol.293 was good, but there were too many letters, and the color of the letters was not so good. Although the pictures on the table of contents were all different, it would have been better to harmonize the pictures. Moreover, it was hard to differentiate the World News from the other articles, so it would be better to put line on the table of contents. For the Campus Briefing, it is not good to use numbers like 2019 or 2020 a lot on the title. Some of the tables on the Campus Briefing were hard to read. We should also avoid using posters for the pictures, but the title for “RUS program” was fine. For the Opinion article, it would be better to clearly state the reporter’s opinion as the corner is the Opinion, but the layouts and editorial cartoon were striking. The overall layout for the Campus Life was tidy, but it was hard to distinguish between an appetizer and the main dishes. As the food emphasized in the Campus Life article was focused on using appliances, it would have been better to emphasize the appliances. There was also a small mistake such as using a different font for “RtA”. For the Global Life, the article was abundant and informative. However, the picture quality in the German student’s article was not so good. For the Cover Story, it was good timing to write this kind of historical article and the topic was fresh and informative. It was good to make the cover of the Cover Story at the starting point. Compared to the other layouts, the layout of the Interview was a little messy. It would have been better to put more core and useful questions in the first, second, and third questions. The overall layouts for the Bulletin Comment was good as the color and illustrations were fine. However, it was a little disappointing that there were no actual images. There were too many questions for the Exchange Student, so it was hard to read. It would have been better to emphasize each question, too. For the Cartoon, there were not enough details, so it was hard to figure out what the cartoon was highlighting at first. For the World News, it was good to try and write these kinds of articles, and the overall content was good. However, some of the layouts were confusing. The title of the Trend article was too simple and it was not very catchy. Furthermore, the selections did not have much unity. For the Review 1, it was good to focus on this kind of uncommon topic, but the content was a little disappointing. The overall layout lacked a little, too. For the Review 2, it would have been better to write this article based on the appropriate timing such as mentioning the Nike Run and so on, but the layout was simple and tidy. Lastly, for the Ohayo article, as the last paragraph summarizes the article, it would have been better to distinguish that paragraph from the article by using box or lines.