For table of contents, photo of Bulletin Comment was not matched with the content. The World News’ title was too long and then it was hard to read. Moreover, there was typographical error. Some of Campus Briefing had no subhead. First Campus Briefing
news did not have a few words on being elected. It would be better to wirte in more detailed pledge. It was hard to read because of narrow-space layout. The name of student union would be changed to “To Twenty” that they want to be written. There was typing error. Second article was interesting to read. However, it had the Korean from the picture. It was not good that the names of the winners were not written on it. For the third article, it was hard to recognize LED image from the picture. It would be better to reject to use same words and informal style. Last article was confusing because the name KU (The name of mascort) and KU (Konkuk University) was written in the same word. Pictures were dark and had narrowed space. For the Opinon article, the pictures were all similar. The composition of the contents was hard to read and had a lot of emotional contents. For the first World News article, parentheses and words are attached and it was difficult to read because the U.S.A’s name was not kept. However, It was good to annotate a lot of economic terms. Second article had wrong photo and it had unnatural sentences. Moreover, it looks like not News but brand promotion article and it was hard to read because of sentences’ connection. Nevertheless, the content of this article was interesting and sentences are quite good to read. Last World News article had strong tone and had no explanation about measure. For Cartoon, title font style was bad and overall quality was disappointing. Nevertheless, the same color of flag and shirt was good. From Global Life article, interview questions from Chinese student continued. However, other students’ questions did not continued and answers from each student was entertaining. In general, Cover Story was good. It was nice to read because of famous countries’ example. Moreover, the usage of slogan was good. However, it would be better to use layout in similar ways and use short tip boxes. Interview article was interesting to interview baker. However, it had similar questions and had bad layout. Bulletin Comment was interesting. However, it had many commas and it was hard to read. It would be better to use other schools’ example and to make comparison between the number of students and schools. Exchange Student had almost same layout as the previous volume. Review was good since the reader could actually try the article’s content. Nihao had short summary of content.
Byeon Sae-eun, Editor firstname.lastname@example.org
<저작권자 © 건국불레틴, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지>